WW3 by proxy?
Nobody wants the fire, yet everyone is flicking matches. Modern conflict is wired for escalation.
Text size
Nobody wants the fire, yet everyone is flicking matches. Modern conflict is wired for escalation.
Clear criteria needed for its use
Marathon dancing is not for the faint-hearted. Nigerian professional dancer Benjamin Daniel did it in an attempt to set…
A war of words has erupted between the Chinese Embassy in Manila and the maritime research group SeaLight over…
Marcos acknowledged the Philippines still has significant ground to cover relative to its regional and global peers.
World War III isn’t coming. It may already be here. Not tanks on the Champs-Élysées, but proxies, drones and supply chains stretching from Kyiv to the Red Sea.
Nowhere is this risk clearer than in the Middle East, where, after effectively disrupting Hormuz and triggering a severe oil and gas crunch, Iran has explicitly warned that if the United States presses operations against its territory, it could target the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, critical for global shipping and 12 percent of the world’s seaborne oil.
Bab el-Mandeb is far from Iran’s backyard. Yet Tehran-armed Houthis in Yemen stand ready to strike in the Red Sea chokepoint, marking a fresh, uncontrolled escalation widely seen as an intentional widening of the war and a potential magnet for outside powers.
Iran’s sprawling proxy network has increasingly pulsed with possibility and danger. Case in point: Kuwait, which foiled a plot to assassinate state leaders and arrested six suspects allegedly linked to Hezbollah, Iran’s most powerful proxy. Qatar thwarted two Iranian-linked cells, while Bahrain cracked down on several suspected spies for Tehran.
These are active, coordinated sleeper networks ready to hit Gulf states with ties to Washington or those hosting US forces, reflecting a conflict that is already global in consequence and aligned in risk.
Some militias act on orders, others on impulse. One rogue strike could trigger an escalation no one planned. And now Russia is angry.
US-Israel airstrikes in Iran have struck near both Bushehr, the Russian-built nuclear power plant staffed by Moscow engineers and Natanz, a uranium enrichment facility.
The Kremlin has condemned the strikes as extremely dangerous, an affront to its strategic interests, and undermining its standing. It is evacuating Rosatom personnel from Bushehr, warning that hits to nuclear infrastructure risk irreparable consequences.
Russia, still locked in its brutal war with Ukraine, has supplied Tehran with intelligence and targeting data that help Iran strike US forces and partners.
Beijing has also sounded caution over the strikes while abstaining from punitive UN votes.
Its silence is action. Beijing’s deeply rooted “non-intervention” doctrine keeps it on the sidelines of the Middle East conflict. But no troops? No problem. Supplying parts, technology and diplomatic cover is enough to keep Iran fighting and US attention divided.
North Korean families watch closely, worried the Iran war could pull Pyongyang in. They fear overseas deployment, while Kim’s missile and nuclear rhetoric mirrors Tehran’s escalation.
Meanwhile, Ukraine, squeezed for munitions, now exports drone defense expertise to Gulf allies even as NATO and the United States pour weapons, training and intelligence into Kyiv, keeping the fight against Russia alive.
US partners from Japan to the Philippines watch nervously as Washington pulls forces to the Middle East, leaving potential gaps in the Indo-Pacific that China could exploit. Remember Iraq?
These are not isolated wars. The same global web of alliances that sustains Ukraine now intersects with the Middle East, turning distant skirmishes into connected theaters of risk.
History shows regional fights can explode into world wars. Nobody wants the fire, yet everyone is flicking matches. Modern conflict is wired for escalation. One misfire — in the Red Sea, Bushehr or Kyiv — and it becomes official.
