House panel to discuss possible rejection of Duterte lawyers in impeachment case

VICE President Sara Duterte

VICE President Sara Duterte

The country has struggled to make progress because officials seek to enrich themselves through public office, Ombudsman…

The focus on reforming, rather than “neutralizing,” law offenders under the current dispensation resulted in the…

Cebu Pacific (CEB) is tapping the Department of Tourism’s (DoT) latest domestic tourism campaign to drive passenger…

Persuasion does not require belittling others. The most persuasive advocates are not those who proclaim their…

Pag-IBIG Fund released P69.19 billion in housing loans during the first half of 2026, posting double-digit…
The House Committee on Justice will deliberate next week on whether to reject the entry of appearance of two lawyers representing Vice President Sara Duterte in the ongoing impeachment proceedings, Bicol Saro Party-list Rep. Terry Ridon said Saturday, March 14.
During a news forum, Ridon said the committee plans to discuss on March 18 the possible rejection of lawyers Michael Poa and Reynold Munsayac as counsel for Duterte, citing concerns about a potential conflict of interest.
“I think there is a real conflict there that needs to get called out if the two lawyers would be allowed,” Ridon told reporters in Quezon City, referring to the pair’s inclusion in Duterte’s defense team.
Ridon said the participation of the two lawyers, given their roles in matters under investigation — including the use of confidential funds and procurement activities at the Department of Education (DepEd) — raises a “serious concern,” as they could potentially invoke lawyer-client privilege.
“They could invoke the lawyer-client confidentiality rule if they are allowed to enter appearance, so I think we would rather reject their entry of appearance so we can openly invite them as resource persons and witnesses,” he added.
The impeachment proceedings against Duterte stem from complaints alleging misuse of confidential funds, abuse of power and other charges that were filed in early February and later declared sufficient in substance by the justice committee earlier this month.
Ridon said the discussion on Wednesday, March 18, will focus on whether Poa and Munsayac should remain as Duterte’s counsel.
“What would happen is there’d be a motion to reject the entry of appearance of the two lawyers that has to be discussed by the committee,” he said.
No formal decision has yet been announced on the possible rejection of the lawyers’ entry of appearance.
Duterte’s camp has not publicly commented on the House panel’s planned discussion as of Saturday.