Keng filed a complaint with the National Bureau of Investigation in 2017. The complaint was later forwarded to the Department of Justice, which filed the cyber libel case in court in 2019.
In its latest filing, the OSG argued that the prosecution of the case should no longer proceed because the offense had already been prescribed.
“Upon a considered rethinking of the demand to balance the protection of reputation, privacy, and dignity with the constitutionally guaranteed rights and liberties, the OSG now accepts the Court’s judgment in Causing and its consequent application to the instant case,” it added.
The OSG explained that prescription rules exist to encourage prompt prosecution and to protect individuals from being forced to defend themselves against charges filed long after the alleged offense occurred.
The Supreme Court will decide whether to adopt the OSG’s recommendation and overturn the cyber libel conviction against Ressa and Santos.
“Only lawful disposition is acquittal,” OSG said.