Pasig mayor denies vote-buying allegations
‘The distribution of cash assistance during the 10-day election ban is clear vote buying.’

PASIG City Mayor Vico Sotto
‘The distribution of cash assistance during the 10-day election ban is clear vote buying.’

PASIG City Mayor Vico Sotto

Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto urged graduating law students of the University of the Philippines to resist everyday ethical…

MISAMIS ORIENTAL — Government agencies in Northern Mindanao have launched a series of linked initiatives aimed at…

A manhunt is underway for two suspects after arresting a driver who allegedly conspired with unidentified cohorts to…

ATLANTA (AFP) — The Egyptian football federation said on Wednesday it had asked for the officiating team from the…

The B/B Florentino Das is currently berthed at the Pasig River Esplanade, standing in contrast to the modern high-rise…
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has submitted for resolution a disqualification complaint against Pasig City Mayor Vico Sotto involving allegations of vote-buying linked to the distribution of student scholarships.
According to minutes of a hearing released by Atty. Ronald Santiago, a hearing officer for Pasig City’s 1st District, the case moved toward resolution following the 5 January submission of a rejoinder-affidavit by Sotto’s legal team.
While the complainant, Victor H. Barral, was present at the hearing, Sotto was represented by counsel from the Macalintal Law Office.
Barral, a former city hall employee, filed the case accusing Sotto of violating the Omnibus Election Code. The complaint alleges that the administration distributed scholarship allowances to students between 6 and 8 May, just days before the 12 May elections.
Atty. Ferdinand Topacio, representing Barral, argued that the distribution fell within the 10-day prohibited period for releasing government funds.
“The distribution of cash assistance during the 10-day election ban is clear vote-buying,” Topacio said.
He also questioned the timing of the release, noting that the allowances were originally scheduled for January.
“So why was it lumped and released within the 10-day prohibited period? It’s hard not to see the timing as politically motivated,” he added.
Topacio said that while Sotto is entitled to due process, the allegations warrant a thorough investigation by the commission.
Sotto has denied the allegations, defending the program as a regular government service. In a statement posted to social media, the mayor said the city government obtained Comelec clearance for the program as early as 24 March.
“Surely, a regular scholarship program doesn’t qualify as election-related assistance,” Sotto said. “Let’s give our young scholars more credit — they know this doesn’t come from me personally.”
With all pleadings now submitted, the Comelec will determine if the distribution constituted a violation of election laws sufficient to disqualify the incumbent mayor.