The Palace on Tuesday pushed back against allegations that the Independent Commission for Infrastructure is merely a front to protect allies of the President, saying critics should first present evidence to support their claims.

Activist Sarah Elago earlier criticized the ICI, describing it as a show meant to shield administration allies. Malacañang rejected the accusation.

Palace press briefer Claire Castro dismissed the claims during a briefing on 20 January, challenging Elago to substantiate her remarks.

“Hindi ba dapat siya ang hingan natin ng ebidensya?” Castro said.

Castro cited the surrender of former senator Bong Revilla, saying it demonstrated respect for the Constitution and due process.

She also said personnel of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure have been working around the clock due to the volume of documents and evidence they review daily.

“Nag-iimbento ng mga walang saysay na istorya para siraan ang gobyerno,” Castro said in response to the accusations.

Castro stressed that the commission is not intended to cover up for anyone, adding that the President “ay walang sinasanto, kaalyado, kamag-anak, kaibigan” when it comes to investigations.

She said any individual who needs to be investigated will be investigated.

On questions about the possible end of the ICI, Castro said this would not pose a problem, noting that both the Office of the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice are actively pursuing probes related to flood control projects.

As for the appointment of new commissioners, Castro said the decision rests with the President.