Department of Justice (DOJ) spokesperson Polo Martinez on Saturday described as “ill-advised” the advice given by lawyer Gabriel Villareal for his client, businessman Atong Ang, not to surrender despite the issuance of a warrant of arrest in connection with the missing sabungero case.

Speaking at a media forum, Martinez said Villareal’s statement was not only unethical but could also expose the lawyer to potential criminal liability, considering his alleged involvement in the case.

“Suggestion not to follow an order lawfully issued by a competent court—I would say that suggestion is ill-advised, and not only unethical but also potentially criminal,” Martinez said.

In a radio interview on Friday, Villareal said Ang should not be treated as a criminal, noting that his client has yet to face trial or be declared guilty.

“Bakit naman niya ipagsasapalaran ang sarili niya sa pagsuko? Marami pa siyang natitirang judicial remedies. Hindi naman dapat siyang tinutugis na parang isang kriminal. Wala pa naman tayong trial at declaration of guilt para kay Mr. Ang,” Villareal said.

Martinez stressed that resisting the enforcement of a warrant of arrest carries penalties under the Revised Penal Code and could lead to additional criminal charges.

He added that the DOJ may recommend a reprimand before the Supreme Court of the Philippines if Villareal’s advice is found to interfere with the justice process. Martinez also noted that Ang’s lawyer could be held liable under the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability.

Meanwhile, Martinez said authorities remain confident that Ang is still in the country, although the trial against him cannot proceed until he is arrested or surrenders.

However, cases against other respondents may continue.

“Does that mean na hindi tatakbo ang kaso with respect to other respondents? No,” Martinez said. “With respect to those who have already been arrested or have surrendered, the trial can proceed.”

He added that evidence submitted by either the prosecution or the accused may still be used, stressing that jurisdiction over the person is required before trial can proceed against a specific accused.