Crooks want to govern the Philippines forever!

Could rampant corruption lead to regional disintegration?

The approval of the bicam report by the House in less than one minute, “in the dark,” when microphones were turned off to preempt questioning, “with P243 billion in unprogrammed appropriations—or pork barrel provisions—still in the 2026 national budget,” is enough proof that the crooks want to govern the Republic of the Philippines forever.

The livestreaming of the initial budget proceedings, according to budget watchdogs, was a mere “palabas.”

Describing it as a “palabas” meant it was a show, a performance, a stunt rather than genuine, transparent deliberations. The term implies the proceedings were a public display or facade designed to give the impression of transparency and accountability, while critics alleged the real decisions or corrupt practices (such as unprogrammed appropriations or pork barrel insertions) might still be happening away from public scrutiny or had already happened.

The hapless and helpless poor Filipinos that constitute the greatest majority of the nation can only say: “The crooks want to govern our country forever!”

Through the years, concerns about large, often ambiguous “unprogrammed appropriations” and last-minute insertions in the national budget, especially during the bicameral conference committee (bicam), were recurring issues seen in budgets from 2022 to 2026, drawing criticism as sources of pork and leading to accusations of corruption.

Efforts at "ensuring" governance, though recent actions, like eliminating loopholes in the 2026 budget, signal attempts at reform.

Key issues and concerns:

1. Unprogrammed Appropriations (UA): These are funds set aside for specific purposes (like disaster relief and debt servicing) but require Congress to pass a separate law or issue special provisions for their release, often becoming a vehicle for insertions.

2. Bicameral Conference Committee (Bicam): This joint committee reconciles the differences between the House and Senate versions of the budget, where significant realignments and additions, often benefiting lawmakers, are made leading to accusations of a pork barrel.

3. Pork barrel and corruption: Critics argue these mechanisms allow discretionary spending, bypassing normal scrutiny, fueling corruption, and ensuring political patronage and accusations of lawmakers wanting to retain power.

Recent Developments (2026) Budget Context:

1. Lawsmakers are actively deliberating on the 2026 General Appropriation Bill (GAB).

2. Senator Win Gatchalian highlighted the elimination of a “corrupt loophole” previously under Unprogrammed Appropriations in the proposed 2026 budget suggesting reforms are being attempted.

3. Discussions also involve the Department of Public Works and Highways budget, with efforts to ensure cost-efficiency and prevent overspending through the recomputation of project costs.

As long as the UA and bicam mechanisms remain in the national budget process, corruption will persist.

Could rampant corruption lead to regional disintegration? Although corruption is now a severe problem, it is widely considered a call for governance reform and accountability within the existing system, rather than a justified legal cause for national fragmentation. Existing laws like the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act provide legal mechanisms to address corruption.

In short, existing legal frameworks treat corruption as a crime to be prosecuted within the established judicial system, and disintegration or secession is viewed as a violation of the Constitution’s core principle of national unity.

Email: arturobesana2@gmail.com