SC cures ailing public health system
For many Filipinos, a hospital visit can lead to a financial nightmare. Thus, the Supreme Court’s recent order to return to Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) its P60-billion fund was more than a legal win — it is a lifeline restored, a promise kept, and a reminder that public health exists to serve the people, not the government’s budget priorities.
The ruling’s message is simple — the fund was never a fiscal convenience, and funds meant for the people’s health cannot be repurposed to plug holes in the national budget. The transfer to the national treasury last year of the P60-billion “idle” PhilHealth fund violated the Universal Health Care Act, which requires that PhilHealth reserves must be reinvested to improve benefits, lower out-of-pocket costs, and fortify its service to its members.
The decision recognized that Filipinos face some of the highest out-of-pocket health costs in Southeast Asia. Many people are hesitant to seek treatment because they fear the bill more than the illness.
PhilHealth’s reputation has yet to fully recover from past scandals and reimbursement delays. In this environment, removing P60 billion from the system was not just legally questionable, but risked widening the cracks in an already fragile public health architecture.
By ordering the fund’s return, the High Court effectively reaffirmed that universal health care is not a slogan to be celebrated once a year or abused as propaganda every election, but a mandate that the government must uphold daily.
The decision forces policymakers to respect earmarks designed to shield social services from political improvisation. It also reminds PhilHealth of its true purpose to protect the people from financial harm every time they enter a hospital, clinic, even a drugstore.
The ruling’s value, however, depends on how PhilHealth will react. If it treats the restored reserve merely as a budgetary buffer, then nothing changes. The reinstated funds must translate to better benefit packages, faster reimbursements to hospitals, and reduced financial burden on patients. It should also accelerate long-overdue reforms in digital claims, fraud detection, and fund management — the same weaknesses that eroded the public trust in the first place.
The decision is somewhat political too. It comes at a time when public frustration over mismanaged funds for flood control projects is growing. The ruling serves as a subtle reminder that accountability still exists — that it matters in a country where the people often feel that institutions tilt more toward power than the public welfare. Returning the P60 billion to PhilHealth signals, symbolically and materially, a return to public service.
The ruling subtly challenges the executive and legislative branches to align future budgets to the spirit of universal health care. If the law says PhilHealth’s reserves must benefit its members, then the next appropriations cycle should reflect this and not reinterpret it.
As a Poll Starter, the decision is about more than money. It is about restoring confidence that a Filipino’s access to health care does not depend on the fiscal creativity of the moment.
The Supreme Court has done its part by reaffirming the law. If used wisely, the reinstated P60 billion could help ease hospital bills, expand coverage, restore trust in the healthcare system, and fulfill the government leaders’ civic duty to provide relief for every Filipino family — showing that public resources exist to serve, not to sit idle or be redirected.
