Former Ako Bicol Partylist Representative Zaldy Co's statement during his exposé leans more toward political motives rather than legal ones and considered hearsay, at least until he returns to the Philippines, according to Professor and Political Analyst Jean Franco.

In a DZRH interview, Franco explained that for Co's statement to be considered reliable and accurate, he must return to the Philippines and present evidence; otherwise, his claims will remain hearsay. She also suggested that this may be Co's way of avoiding accountability for unresolved corruption issues.

"Ngayon, sa parte ng presidente, siguro kailangan niyang ipakita na wala siyang kikilingan sa mga imbestigasyon. Bagama’t mahirap para sa kaniya sumagot, mas maganda sabihin niya na hindi siya makikialam sa anumang imbestigasyon saan man ito umabot," she added.

Franco also recommended that Co consult a lawyer to support his claim that he has not benefited from any corruption related to flood control projects. She said that the public, including herself, may find it difficult to trust Co's statements without proof.

She also said it would be more effective if Co returned to the Philippines rather than simply pointing fingers at others, as being far away shields him from any risk or consequences. In Co's statement, he mentioned his life being at risk. Hence, his fear of going back home in the country.

"Kapag sinabi kong political iyong exposé ni Zaldy Co, ang ibig sabihin ko, parang may nais lang siyang magulo, para ulitin lang, para malimutan na. Para magkaroon ng sinasabi nilang reset, para isantabi ang mga akusasyon laban sa kaniya," she said.

Although she strongly believes that those responsible must be held accountable, Franco cautioned that the public should approach Co's statements about exposing corruption with skepticism.

"Kaibahan, mabigat din ang mga sinabi niya. Kung ano man iyon, kung totoo, hayaan natin ang batas at ang ating law enforcement authority na ayusin ito. Pero umuwi siya," she emphasized.