Justice over politics
Too often, the lines between law and politics blur. Political decisions chase popularity; legal decisions stand firm on evidence and principle.
Daily TribuneToo often, the lines between law and politics blur. Political decisions chase popularity; legal decisions stand firm on evidence and principle.
When newly appointed Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla declared that his decisions as Ombudsman would be “legal, not political,” it wasn’t just a sound bite — it was a statement of principle. In an age when politics often seeps into every crevice of governance, his assertion strikes at the heart of what justice should be: fair, objective, and anchored in law, not convenience.
Too often, the lines between law and politics blur. Political decisions chase popularity, driven by the winds of public sentiment or the lure of power. Legal decisions, on the other hand, stand firm on evidence and principle — guided by what is right, not what is popular or expedient. The difference defines the strength of a nation’s justice system. When that distinction fades, so does public faith in the rule of law.
A justice system grounded on evidence and reason, rather than noise and pressure, ensures that every individual — regardless of wealth, position, or influence — is held to the same standard. It builds predictability, consistency, and trust. But trust, once lost, is the hardest to rebuild.
We’ve seen what happens when justice bends to politics: selective prosecutions, convenient absolutions, and eventually public disillusionment. In contrast, when decisions are made with clear eyes and steady purpose — guided solely by law — justice becomes credible, even when unpopular.
That’s why Remulla’s declaration matters. It’s a reminder that integrity in governance doesn’t begin with popularity; it begins with principle. Especially now, amid public outrage over alleged ghost projects and corruption scandals, people don’t just demand accountability — they demand most of all credibility. The public want to see a justice system that cannot be bullied, bought, or bent.
For lawyers, this is the core of our duty. To think legally, not politically. To act based on proof, not pressure or expedience. To ensure that justice remains impartial — unshaken by shifting public mood or political maneuvering. Because only then can democracy function as it should: with the law as its firm spine, not politics as its puppet strings.
Ultimately, the Ombudsman’s stance is more than a personal commitment. It’s a challenge to everyone in public service — to choose justice over politics, law over loyalty, truth over power.
If we truly want to restore faith in our institutions, we must protect the space where justice breathes freely — uncorrupted, unafraid, and unbent.