The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that online chat logs and videos are admissible as evidence in criminal cases, shutting down the privacy plea of human traffickers.

The ruling was in connection with the plea of Eul Vincent O. Rodriguez, who used Facebook and other platforms to prey on victims, to rule out as evidence chat logs and videos that resulted in life imprisonment under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 (RA 9208).

The court’s ruling, written by Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez dated 9 October 2024, revealed details of how Rodriguez orchestrated his crimes online.

The record showed that in 2013, the Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force of Region 7 began investigating Rodriguez after receiving a tip from the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Police Officer 3 Jerry Gambi used a decoy account to communicate with Rodriguez across various online platforms, recording their correspondence.

Online interactions began wherein Rodriguez offered PO3 Gambi nude shows in exchange for money, including one involving his minor cousins.

Once the show started and was recorded, PO3 Gambi stopped the show and set up an entrapment operation where he told Rodriguez that a foreign friend was staying at a certain hotel.

A 14-year-old was offered by the accused to meet them at the hotel to do a live nude show.

During the entrapment operation, Rodriguez accepted marked money from the foreigner posing as “Kyle Edwards,” who was an undercover confidential informant of the Task Force, and when the payment was accepted the suspect was arrested and charged.

Rodriguez was convicted by the Regional Trial Court which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

In upholding Rodriguez’s conviction, the high bench found that the videos and recordings of the chat logs of Rodriguez’s conversations with PO3 Gambi can be admitted as evidence.

The Court rejected Rodriguez’s arguments that they were inadmissible for violating his privacy rights. RA No. 10173, or the Data Privacy Act of 2012, allows the processing of sensitive personal information to determine a person’s criminal liability and to protect the rights and interests of persons in court proceedings.

The Court emphasized that the videos and chat logs were presented as evidence to show Rodriguez’s method of reaching out to foreigners through Skype or Facebook and offering minors for sexual exploitation.

Aside from the prison term the court also ordered Rodriguez P600,000 in damages, with legal interest of 6 percent per annum from the finality of judgment, until full payment.