KAPA ringleaders meted life sentence
The RTC found all elements of estafa present in the case, given that there was false pretense or misrepresentation made by Apolinario

The RTC found all elements of estafa present in the case, given that there was false pretense or misrepresentation made by Apolinario


Citicore Renewable Energy Corp. (CREC) has secured P4.05 billion in fresh financing from state-run Land Bank of the…

Nosy Tarsee caught word from the trading floor and it’s not a happy one for a certain batch of small investors who…

The International Finance Corp. (IFC), the private-sector arm of the World Bank Group, has committed $100 million to…

International Container Terminal Services Inc. (ICTSI) has set a new benchmark for the local stock market after…

The inauguration on 13 July also reminded us that infrastructure is not just about concrete and buildings. It is about…
Masterminds of Kapa Community Ministry International Inc., or KAPA, touted as the largest investment scam ever, have been sentenced to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment for syndicated estafa, following a case build-up by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, over its illegal investment-taking activities.
In a decision promulgated on 12 December, Branch 33 of the Regional Trial Court, or RTC, of Butuan City found Kapa leaders Joel Apolinario, Cristobal R. Baradad, and Joji Jusay guilty beyond reasonable doubt of eight counts of syndicated estafa, as defined and penalized under Article 315 (2)(a) of the Revised Penal Code, in relation to Presidential Decree 1689.
Apolinario, also referred to as Pastor Joel, was the founder and president of KAPA, while Baradad and Jusay were among its incorporators. All three were sentenced to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment, and to pay eight actual damages amounting to P195,000 to complainants.
Syndicated estafa is committed if false pretenses are executed prior to or simultaneously with the commission of fraud, by using a fictitious name, or falsely pretending to possess power, influence, qualifications, property, credit, agency, business, or imaginary transactions, or by means of other similar deceits.
Elements of estafa present
The RTC found all elements of estafa present in the case, given that there was false pretense or misrepresentation made by Apolinario and the other accused when they claimed to be authorized to engage in a profit-making venture or business. The case was handled by Assistant City Prosecutor Claudine Calo and City Prosecutor Aljay Go.
"Clearly, (Apolinario) together with (Baradad and Jusay) employed fraud or deceit by falsely pretending or misrepresenting that they are authorized by the SEC to engage in profit-making business when in truth and in fact, they are not authorized to do so being a non-stock corporation," the RTC held.
The accused promised investors a 30 percent monthly interest for life on their investments. Relying on this false pretense, the complainants were duped to invest their money. As a result, they suffered damage since nothing was returned from their investments, the RTC added.
The court affirmed the finding of the SEC that the solicitation activities of KAPA were akin to a Ponzi scheme.
"The court takes credence on the testimony of the witness from SEC, who testified that the means employed by KAPA is akin to a Ponzi scheme," read the decision.
"In People of the Philippines vs Rosario Baladjay, which is on all fours with the present cases, a similar ruling was made by the Supreme Court which explained the too-good-to-be-true promises of a Ponzi scheme, wherein the purported investment program offers impossible high returns and pays these returns to early investors out of the capital contributed by later investors," the court noted.
The decision comes around six years after the SEC found KAPA to have enticed the public to invest P10,000 in the guise of a donation, in exchange for a 30 percent monthly return for life dubbed as a "blessing."
Under Section 8(8.1) of the SRC, securities shall not be sold or offered for sale or distribution within the Philippines without a registration statement duly filed and approved by the SEC.
Section 26.1 further provides that it shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of any securities to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud.
Section 28 adds that no person shall engage in the business of buying or selling securities in the Philippines as a broker or dealer, or act as a salesman, or an associated person of any broker or dealer unless registered with the SEC.