CoA flags Benguet governor
The disbursements were for the road improvement of the Amburayan-Boneng Provincial Road Phase 2 at Kapangan, Benguet
The disbursements were for the road improvement of the Amburayan-Boneng Provincial Road Phase 2 at Kapangan, Benguet

The so-called “Oplan Romanov,” or the alleged covert operation purportedly aimed at eliminating Vice President Sara…

TACLOBAN CITY — Just a week after classes resumed following a fatal mass shooting on campus, officials at San Jose…

The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) has signed up another corporation to expand public access to the…

Water reserves at Pantabangan Dam are rising steadily following heavy rains brought by the southwest monsoon and…

Bureau of Customs (BoC) personnel at the Port of Clark have intercepted four shipments containing marijuana resin and…

Read next

What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
BAGUIO CITY — The Commission on Audit in Cordillera issued a notice of disallowance to the office of Benguet Governor Melchor Diclas, members of the Provincial Bids and Awards Committee and Technical Working Group as it observed some violations to rule of procurements pertaining to the declaration of a winning bidder for a road project.
The state auditor revealed that the disallowed amount — totaling P20,738,611.08 — violated the Revised Internal Rules and Regulations and Republic Act 9184 or the General Procurements Act.
It also identified two disbursements — the first disbursement was done in 4 May 2021 amounting to P14,877,944.50 and the other was done in 29 December 2021 amounting to P5,860,666.58.
The disbursements were for the road improvement of the Amburayan-Boneng Provincial Road Phase 2 at Kapangan, Benguet.
The contract — with a total amount of P26,977,493.33 — was awarded to Balintugan Construction Services on October 2020 after three biddings. The first bidding was declared failures as the bidder was non-responsive.
The second bidding was declared failure by the BAC because of issue of non-compliance. Said declaration was approved by the Head of Procurement Entity, which is Diclas. However, the state auditor found that the declaration of failure is improper as certain processes under the law were not followed.