
The so-called “Oplan Romanov,” or the alleged covert operation purportedly aimed at eliminating Vice President Sara…

TACLOBAN CITY — Just a week after classes resumed following a fatal mass shooting on campus, officials at San Jose…

The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) has signed up another corporation to expand public access to the…

Water reserves at Pantabangan Dam are rising steadily following heavy rains brought by the southwest monsoon and…

Bureau of Customs (BoC) personnel at the Port of Clark have intercepted four shipments containing marijuana resin and…

Read next

What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
A trial court in Negros Occidental ordered the arrest of former Sugar Regulatory Authority Administrator Herminigildo Serafica after he was found guilty of indirect contempt for issuing a memorandum authorizing sugar imports despite a court order prohibiting it.
Himamaylan City Regional Trial Court Branch 55 presiding Judge Walter Zorilla — in a decision released on Monday — sentenced Serafica to 15 days in prison and directed him to pay a fine of P30,000.
A warrant of arrest was also issued against Serafica.
The case stemmed on Serafica's issuance of Memorandum Circular 11 or the Resumption of Implementation of Sugar Order 3 series of 2021-2022 on 4 May which allowed the processing of applications for the importation of 200,000 metric tons of standard grade refined sugar and bottler's grade refined sugar despite the Himamaylan RTC issuing a writ of preliminary injunction on 2 March.
Judge Zorilla first issued an order on 2 March 2022 banning the importation of refined sugar after the Negros Occidental Federation of Farmers Association filed a case.
The injunction was in relation to the petition filed by the Negros Occidental Federation of Farmers' Association against the importation program under Sugar Order No. 3.
In his defense, Serafica said that he acted in good faith on the issuance of MC 11, saying that since Region 6 — the judicial region to which the RTC belongs — was specifically left out of MC 11 and the issuance could not be interpreted as a violation of the WPI.
However, the court said that court said that the issuance of MC 11 "contravened" the WPI.
"Serafica's justification that the preliminary injunction can be enforced only within the 6th Judicial Region, where this court belongs, is utterly misplaced," the order stated. "Clearly, there is absolutely nothing in the preliminary injunction that enjoined the implementation of Sugar Order 3 only in the 6th Judicial Region."