Our planning from the outset has been based on what is euphemistically called a hard Brexit

Britain’s Asia-focused bank HSBC on Monday revealed a $765-million US fine over the lender’s actions in the run-up to the subprime crisis, as it also logged rising first-half profits.

HSBC said it has agreed to pay the large US penalty over its conduct in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), a type of investment derivative that bundled home loans into securities and was sold to investors before the 2008 financial meltdown.

“HSBC reached a settlement-in-principle to resolve the Department of Justice’s civil claims relating to its investigation of HSBC’s legacy RMBS origination and securitisation activities from 2005 to 2007,” the lender announced in a results statement.

“Under the terms of the settlement, HSBC will pay the DoJ a civil money penalty of $765 million.”

The London-headquartered giant is the latest global bank to reach a US settlement over conduct in the run-up to the notorious subprime crisis which sparked a worldwide recession.

However, the deal was agreed in July and therefore was not included in HSBC’s first half results, which cover the six months to June.

HSBC posted advancing first-half profits and expressed optimism over the outlook — despite headwinds from rising costs, the China-US trade war and Brexit.

Pre-tax profit rose almost five percent to $10.7 billion in the six months to the end of June compared with a year earlier.

Net profit or earnings after taxation gained 2.5 percent to $7.173 billion, boosted by high-growth markets —particularly in Asia and the Middle East.

“We haven’t yet seen any impact on our business or through our customers,” chief executive John Flint told reporters when asked about the impact of the China-US trade spat.

“It’s still too early to tell and in terms of estimating potential impact it’s difficult because we don’t quite know what the substance of the trade war will be.

“We’ve got some tariffs in place and some coming, but the full impact is very difficult to estimate.

“It is possible that it will shave China’s GDP growth by a modest amount but (it is) too early too start predicting.”

Turning to Britain’s looming departure from the European Union next year, the bank chief stressed that its cost estimate for a so-called hard Brexit remained unchanged.

The lender had warned late last year that a chaotic Brexit could cost it up to $300 million.

It had also outlined tentative plans to switch 1,000 jobs to Paris from London owing to Britain’s departure from the European Union due in 2019.

“Our role has been to ensure that we are in a position to secure customers’ … needs across the UK, Europe and the network that we serve in 67 markets across the world,” added Flint on Monday.

“Our planning from the outset has been based on what is euphemistically called a hard Brexit, and therefore the cost guidance that we have given in that regard remains absolutely consistent with what we have talked about in the past.”