Expert testimonies in marriage annulment cases
With Tan-Andal as the new doctrine, the Highest Court did away with the necessity for an expert witness
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read
Daily Tribune
With Tan-Andal as the new doctrine, the Highest Court did away with the necessity for an expert witness
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read
It contended that petitioner was not able to prove respondent’s psychological incapacity
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read
As we are all aware, the prosecution cannot rely on the weakness of the accused’s evidence, but on the strength of its evidence
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read
Jurisprudence holds that inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony do not impair her credibility
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read
There is no factual basis to conclude that all of their employees who marry each other would be unable to perform their duties, entailing one’s dismissal
Eduardo Martinez · · 4 min read
Judging by the pronouncement above of the Supreme Court, my take is that it is still splitting the cause of action, which results in forum shopping
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read
When a person’s liberty is at stake, he must have all the chances to cross-examine the witnesses of the prosecution to prove his innocence, if in case they are…
Eduardo Martinez · · 3 min read