OPINION

Choices empowered women make

Ultimately, this conversation is about far more than a girl group’s past. It is about who controls a woman’s narrative.

Margarita Gutierrez

When a former member of the iconic SexBomb Girls returned recently to the spotlight, it wasn’t nostalgia that captured the public’s attention. It was a statement that sparked debate: Alvin Aragon, husband of Izzy Trazona, claimed her exit from the group years ago was divinely inspired — “Pinag-resign ng Lord.”

On the surface, it sounds sensational. But beneath the viral soundbite lies a simpler truth: a woman’s conviction about her career, her dreams and her calling.

In the Philippines, where faith permeates daily life, many women frame their choices through prayer and spiritual guidance. But interpreting Trazona’s decision only through her husband’s words risks overshadowing her agency. Faith does not erase autonomy, it can deepen it. A woman can feel called by God and still fully own her decisions.

The controversy grew when marital dynamics entered the conversation, with some insinuating that Trazona had sought her husband’s approval to return for a group reunion. Critics framed this as a man exerting his control. Yet in many faith-centered marriages, consultation is mutual respect, not subjugation. Sharing decisions with a partner can reflect partnership, not dependence.

At its core, the debate is about empowerment. Must it always look like rebellion? Or can it also be a deliberate, thoughtful choice to step away from a role that no longer aligns with one’s purpose?

Empowerment is fundamentally about freedom — the freedom to choose, whether in corporate leadership, artistic reinvention, family, ministry, or returning to the stage. The heart of empowerment lies in a woman’s authority over her own life. If Trazona concluded that leaving the group best reflected her values, faith, or growth, that decision belonged to her alone, even if framed in spiritual terms.

The viral responses also underscored a generational shift. Younger Filipinos are keenly aware of gender dynamics and protective of women’s independence, which is commendable. But empowerment should not dismiss the strength women derive from faith-based convictions. Supporting autonomy and respecting spirituality can and must coexist.

“Pinag-resign ng Lord” may seem dramatic or even provocative. Through a woman-centered lens, it signals conviction: a woman attuned to her purpose, making deliberate choices in alignment with her journey.

Ultimately, this conversation is about far more than a girl group’s past. It is about who controls a woman’s narrative. True empowerment is letting women author their own stories, guided by ambition, principle, love, or prayer, without reducing their choices to the perspective of someone else.