The Floodgate scandal involving alleged mismanagement, irregularities, and embezzlement in flood control projects under the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) has rekindled concerns about the country’s vulnerability to money laundering.
The scandal centers on billions of pesos in public funds potentially siphoned off through ghost projects, overpricing, and favoritism toward select contractors.
Nosy Tarsee was told by government insiders that, as a result, the scam has direct implications for the Philippines’ status on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) “grey list,” referred to as the “dirty money list,” which flags jurisdictions with deficiencies in anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures.
The Philippines was removed from the grey list in May 2025 after addressing issues like casino-related money laundering and inadequate prosecutions.
However, the Floodgate scandal’s exposure of weak oversight in government procurement and potential illicit fund flows could trigger a reassessment by the FATF.
A return to the list would mean intensified international scrutiny, requiring the country to submit regular progress reports and to implement corrective actions, which would have a direct bearing on foreign investments, as banks and businesses might face higher compliance costs when dealing with Philippine entities.
Being relisted in the dirty money roster could lead to reduced access to global financial markets, higher borrowing costs for the government and the private sector and a slowdown in remittances and foreign direct investment.
For instance, the scandal had prompted asset freezes totaling around P13 billion linked to the suspects, including electronic wallets and securities accounts, highlighting gaps in tracking “dirty money.”
Broader effects might include a dip in gross domestic product (GDP) growth projections, as seen in IMF reports trimming the 2025 outlooks amid the fallout.
Additionally, it could exacerbate inflation and strain the banking sector if lenders face increased AML audits, potentially weakening loan demand and net interest margins.
The scandal could erode public trust in the Marcos administration, leading to political instability. Investigations have revealed that up to 20 percent of a ₱545-billion flood control budget went to just 15 contractors, fueling accusations of cronyism.
Socially, it underscores ongoing issues in disaster management, as mismanaged funds result in inadequate flood protections for vulnerable communities, potentially worsening inequality and public discontent.
The government is actively pursuing investigations to demonstrate its commitment to anti-money laundering standards. This includes freezing assets and encouraging whistleblowers, with one potential informant offering details on P5 billion in ghost projects.
Successful convictions could help avert a reinstatement to the grey list.