OPINION

Trappings of power

A bald, elected official funded by taxpayers has been absent from the Senate for weeks, allegedly hiding over a still-unconfirmed ICC warrant.

Vivienne Angeles (VA), Carl Magadia, Jason Mago

Behind closed doors

Strip away the fame and this would be a straightforward abuse case. Add celebrity status, and suddenly everything becomes complicated.

A personal driver now accuses actress Rhian Ramos and beauty queen Michelle Dee of assault, torture and illegal detention inside a Makati condominium — claims that include beatings, chemical burns to the eyes, three days of confinement and a desperate escape from a high-rise window.

The accused have denied everything, insisting there was only a theft case, already dismissed, and no detention to speak of. Two versions. One truth.

What makes this case explosive is not just the allegations, it’s the imbalance of power. A driver must prove every bruise. Celebrities are granted time, statements and the benefit of the doubt. The driver was swiftly charged. The counter-complaint is still “awaiting a copy.”

Employment residency is now being floated as a defense against illegal detention. That argument should alarm everyone. Since when does being a driver mean surrendering freedom?

The involvement of VACC and the NBI signals this isn’t mere noise. If the claims are false, evidence will expose them. If they are true, then fame has once again been used as a shield.

This case isn’t about stardom. It’s about whether power can still lock a door and expect silence on the other side.

Which version is true?

— Jason Mago

No work, with pay

A regular employee gets 15 days of vacation leave and 15 days of sick leave — both subject to approval. Miss work without clearance and you’re docked pay, stripped of benefits or slapped with sanctions.

Say you’re “lying low” because of a rumor, and HR won’t even finish the meeting before escorting you out. Now look at Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.

A bald, elected official funded by taxpayers has been absent from the Senate for weeks, allegedly hiding over a still-unconfirmed ICC warrant. No attendance. No immediate consequence.

Ordinary Filipinos don’t get that privilege. We don’t get to disappear and still collect salaries. We don’t get to claim fear as a work arrangement. We don’t get to say, “Don’t worry, I’m working remotely,” and expect applause. Sana all.

What makes it worse is the shrug. Some colleagues hesitate to impose sanctions, invoking precedent — including Panfilo Lacson, who once went into hiding himself.

Public office is not a shield from accountability. It is not a paid refuge. If ordinary workers are expected to show up or face consequences, elected officials should be held to an even higher standard.

Otherwise, stop calling it public service. Call it privilege. 

— Carl Magadia

Delulu

No one would allow themselves to be humiliated on their own home court — especially when they know they’ve done nothing wrong.

The Chinese Embassy in Manila’s recent remarks against Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson Commodore Jay Tarriela are unacceptable. Accusing him of “attacking” and “smearing” China, and of spreading false narratives about the West Philippine Sea, is not only misleading — it is audacious.

China has become delusional in its superpower image, behaving as if the rest of the world should bow, stay silent and accept its version of reality. Imagine foreign officials openly disrespecting your country’s institutions on your own soil.

Whose boats were water-cannoned in their own seas?

Whose fishermen were barred from fishing in their own areas?

Whose sailor had his finger cut off? These are not narratives. These are documented incidents.

China is an important trading and economic partner of the Philippines. So much is at stake — imports, investments, jobs. But how long should economic ties excuse intimidation, harassment and repeated violations of international law?

How long should “pragmatism” mean silence? The Philippines, as a middle power, has the capacity to balance its relationships. It does not need to put all its eggs in one basket — especially not in one that repeatedly cracks.

What China seems to resent is that the Philippines is no longer quiet, that it is speaking up, and that it is calling out actions that contradict international norms — despite having exercised maximum tolerance for years.

China accuses the Philippines of disrespect, yet it is China that barks and bites while the Philippines invokes international law, diplomacy and restraint.

— Vivienne Angeles