GLOBAL GOALS

Governance challenges for CEOs: Anchoring on the C-Suite

The C-suite is not just a collection of senior managers, but rather represents the institutional backbone of performance AND sustainability.

Dr. Carlos P. Gatmaitan, FICD

“Growth can be the most dangerous phase of a company’s life”

Kudos to firms that enjoy rapid expansion, albeit the batting average is historically low at best.

Record revenues, more clients, more people — only to discover that the organization’s leadership foundations were underdeveloped and created a very delicate situation towards sustaining the momentum.

The Board through the CEO may have scaled the business, but the company may have failed to scale its systems. Eventually, execution becomes uneven, culture weakens, accountability blurs, and risk accumulates quietly — until a crisis forces everyone to notice what governance should have flagged much earlier.

This relates to an Organizational Development opportunity to fix a “problem” that may be avoided in the first place — the development of the C-Suite.

The C-suite is not just a collection of senior managers, but rather represents the institutional backbone of performance AND sustainability.

It is also why Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) assessments, when conducted objectively, often point toward the same root concern: people and leadership risks.

These include middle-management capability gaps, unclear role ownership, inconsistent standards across units, and weak talent pipelines.

Ironically, these human-capital risks are the ones most neglected during growth because they do not always show up immediately in financial statements.

In practice, governance strength is most visible when a CEO can rely on an aligned and high-performing C-suite — one that turns corporate direction into disciplined execution.

The chief operating officer is expected to be the CEO’s strategic integrator. In high-growth organizations, operations are not simply about efficiency.

It is about ensuring repeatability.

The COO must build execution rhythms, enforce decision discipline, and create an operating model where performance does not depend on “heroic interventions” from the top. When expansion accelerates, the COO’s job is to make execution predictable across branches, not merely to fix problems faster.

The chief financial officer must serve as both strategist and steward — effectively functioning as the Board’s compass. A high-performing CFO does not just report numbers; the CFO interprets them in the context of strategy, risk posture, and long-term value creation.

Budgeting discipline, forecasting credibility, ratio governance, capital allocation frameworks, and transparent discussions of major judgments are all expected. A CFO’s leadership is often measured by the quality of decisions the Board can make because of the CFO’s clarity.

The chief audit executive safeguards governance credibility. As companies scale, internal controls can weaken while complexity rises. Internal audit must remain independent, risk-based, and focused on the exposures that grow in silence: leakages, fraud vulnerabilities, compliance gaps, and operational inconsistencies.

Most importantly, internal audit must drive a remediation culture where issues are resolved with urgency and tracked with accountability — not just reported in neat slides.

The chief marketing officer must anchor growth on customer value, not merely promotional activity.

Expansion magnifies reputational and customer-experience risks. The CMO must ensure that brand standards and customer journeys remain consistent across branches, while aligning marketing initiatives with operational realities and financial discipline. Without this alignment, growth becomes volume without value — and over time, the market corrects it.

The chief IT officer must make digital capability scalable and governance-ready.

After all, we know the significance of digital transformation journeys these days covering cybersecurity, access controls, data integrity, and reporting discipline.

The CIO must ensure a single source of truth for critical data — inventory, receivables, branch performance, and customer analytics — so leadership decisions are evidence-based.

Digital systems should reduce risk and friction, not multiply manual workarounds.

Finally, the head of Human Resources is the institution builder.

HR is not an administrative function; it is the architect of leadership continuity.

HR must clarify executive and management roles, establish performance expectations, build capability frameworks, and strengthen succession pipelines.

It is HR that ensures accountability is measurable, promotions are merited, and leadership quality improves year after year.

In the end, CEOs succeed when the C-suite works towards closing the gap between middle management and executives, cascading corporate direction with clarity, and guiding change on the ground, through continuous mentoring and disciplined follow-through.

After all, the challenge of transformation is the implementation.

Please share your thoughts and comments at corgov.associates@gmail.com.