OPINION

New lawyers must know how to think

The law must remain human. Behind every pleading is a person, sometimes frightened, sometimes wronged, sometimes simply unheard.

Jose Dominic F. Clavano IV

There is something quietly powerful about a new lawyer’s first day after passing the bar. The law books are the same, the courtrooms unchanged, the statutes unmoved. And yet, the profession is renewed. Every generation of lawyers carries with it a fresh set of hopes. Hopes not only for personal success, but for what the law itself can still become.

Today’s new lawyers enter the profession at a time unlike any other. Artificial intelligence can now summarize cases in seconds, draft pleadings with ease and surface jurisprudence that once took days to uncover. Convenience has never been greater. Efficiency has never been faster. And yet, this very convenience poses the most important challenge for the next generation. The preservation of critical thinking.

The law is not a checklist. It is not a prompt. It is not an output. At its core, the practice of law is judgment. It is knowing what matters, what does not, and why. AI can assist, but it cannot replace the lawyer’s responsibility to question assumptions, test arguments, and see beyond what is immediately presented. The hope for new lawyers is that they do not mistake speed for wisdom, nor automation for understanding. The greatest lawyers of the future will not be those who use AI the most, but those who use it most thoughtfully.

More importantly, the law must remain human. Behind every pleading is a person. Sometimes frightened, sometimes wronged, sometimes simply unheard. Compassion is not weakness in the legal profession. It is discernment. There are moments when mercy must temper the application of the law, moments when a firm example must be set, and moments when the law must be enforced strictly, without apology. Knowing the difference is not something an algorithm can teach. It is learned through experience, humility and a deep respect for the consequences of legal power.

The hope is that the new lawyers will resist cynicism. That they will remember why they studied the law in the first place. Not merely to win cases, but to uphold order, protect rights and strengthen institutions. Professionalism is not just about competence. It is about conduct. It is about how one treats colleagues, clients, adversaries and the courts. In an age of shortcuts, professionalism remains a conscious choice.

The future of the legal profession does not lie in rejecting technology, nor in surrendering to it. It lies in balance. AI can professionalize the practice of law by raising standards of preparation and precision. But only lawyers can humanize it, by bringing conscience to complexity, empathy to conflict and courage to difficult decisions.

For those who have just passed the bar, the hope is simple and enduring. That they become lawyers who think deeply, act justly and never forget that the law exists to serve people, not the other way around.