The Philippines has been caught in a cycle of scandals and street rallies for the past three months. The flood-control corruption controversy has sparked almost weekly protests in Manila and other cities. Tens of thousands march demanding accountability, yet ordinary citizens may be better off channeling their energy into building businesses rather than trying to change entrenched political leaders.
The scale of the scandal is staggering. Nearly 9,855 flood-control projects, worth more than P500 billion, have been mismanaged or stolen. Funds meant to protect communities from floods have instead enriched private pockets, leaving infrastructure incomplete and citizens exposed. Even if the individuals involved return a portion of what they have stolen, the damage to the economy remains. Investors are increasingly wary, pulling back from the Philippines due to opaque procurement, weak governance and the risk of political mismanagement.
The consequences are compounded by the country’s dependence on remittances from overseas Filipino workers. For decades, these funds have been a crucial pillar of economic stability. Now, with US President Donald Trump signaling he would halt immigration into the United States, the Philippines faces new risks. Restrictions on migration could reduce remittances, depriving households of income and the government of a key economic buffer.
The lesson is clear: structural reforms are urgent. Procurement must be transparent, oversight strict and public funds protected, but citizens cannot wait for politicians alone to fix the system. Starting local businesses — from small-scale trade to tech startups — is not only practical but a form of resistance. Entrepreneurship builds jobs, generates wealth locally and reduces dependency on unstable government systems and external income.
Markets have already reacted. The Philippine Stock Exchange has seen sell-offs, reflecting investors’ growing distrust. Every peso siphoned off by corruption is a lost opportunity: lost jobs, lost growth and lost confidence. Restoring trust will require more than protests; it will require action, accountability, and a culture of integrity.
The question is urgent: Will the Philippines continue cycling through weekly rallies and political spectacle, or will it embrace reforms and empower its citizens to create real economic opportunities? Encouraging business, fostering local enterprise, and protecting public funds are the pathways to growth. Until then, both investors and ordinary Filipinos will have to navigate a landscape defined by corruption, uncertainty and lost potential.
Quo vadis, Philippines? Unless action is taken, the nation risks losing both investor faith and the ingenuity of its own people.
For comments, email darren.dejesus@gmail.com