A top military official accused of sexually harassing two of his troops is under house arrest, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) confirmed Wednesday.
In a phone interview, AFP spokesperson Col. Francel Margareth Padilla said an internal investigation is underway after preliminary evidence was found, paving the way for possible legal action.
“The accused senior officer was immediately relieved of his post once the complaints were filed. He’s currently under house arrest inside a military camp,” Padilla said.
The senior official, whose identity was not disclosed, will face trial under Articles of War 96 (Conduct Unbecoming of an Officer and a Gentleman) and 97 (Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Military Discipline).
“The allegations include rape through sexual assault for one complainant, and attempted rape through sexual assault for the other,” she said.
Padilla emphasized the AFP has strengthened its internal policies on discipline, accountability and education, including instituting more values formation programs, leadership training, and reinforced grievance and reporting mechanisms.
Padilla stressed the AFP’s commitment to fostering a culture of integrity. “We have zero tolerance for any form of misconduct like this,” she said.
“Our rules and regulations are clear from day one. We also actively implement gender and development programs throughout the ranks. Since this case is ongoing, we’ll evaluate what further changes may be needed,” she added.
Meanwhile, the junior officers involved are receiving the necessary assistance.
“Rest assured, the AFP will take all necessary steps to protect our personnel, including psychological support and other help to improve their well-being,” Padilla said.
The two junior officers are currently under the administrative custody of their service unit.
Asked about a criminal case, Padilla explained, “If a criminal case is filed in civilian court, the AFP defers to that court’s authority on custody.”
“If a warrant of arrest or other legal order is issued, the AFP will comply accordingly,” she added.
Under the Articles of War, however, “the AFP may retain custody of any person subject to military law who is awaiting trial or serving a sentence for offenses punishable under military regulations.”
Padilla explained that military and civilian courts have separate jurisdictions. The General Court Martial (GCM) handles violations of the Articles of War and military rules, while civilian courts deal with offenses under the Revised Penal Code and other laws.
“If verdicts differ, both stand independently. Legal remedies may be pursued separately in each system,” she said.
The AFP’s findings on the case are now awaiting the signature of AFP Chief of Staff General Romeo Brawner Jr., which will trigger the formal convening of a court-martial.
“For review and approval, the case is with the chief of staff who will act as the convening authority,” Padilla said.
General Court-Martial proceedings typically last around six months but can be extended depending on the case’s complexity, witness availability, and legal motions.
“The timeline will vary based on the circumstances of the case,” she said.