OPINION

Labor union in light and shadows

“Today, progressive labor unions recognize that the economic risks of aggressive anti-employer rhetoric and militant actions by some radical labor groups can have detrimental effects on businesses and the broader economy.

Ed Lacson

An ideal labor union leader is fiercely independent, committed to upholding workers’ rights, an effective communicator and negotiator, and an advocate for reasonable wages and benefits. Likewise, he must be a collaborative partner with his employer to ensure mutual growth and stability.

In any type of economic system — whether command economy, market or mixed - labor unions play a crucial role in any enterprise. They help promote discipline, encourage independent thinking, foster respect for authority, preserve order, and drive productivity.

Since the onset of the first industrial revolution, the world of work has evolved from sweatshops to a more organized and regulated workplace through the collective efforts of business owners, labor unions, and governments.

While there may be a few companies that have failed to transition to the new requirements of the ideal workplace, the majority have embraced policies that promote worker-friendly environments.

Today, progressive labor unions recognize that the economic risks of aggressive anti-employer rhetoric and militant actions by some radical labor groups can have detrimental effects on businesses and the broader economy.

Rising labor tensions in a rapidly changing economy combined with belligerent union activities make it harder to address economic challenges such as inflation, stagnant wages, job insecurity, and loss of market which altogether or singly can severely impact both workers and enterprises.

While workers have legitimate grievances, some unions that continue to adopt overly confrontational tactics can do more harm than good. The cost of disruptive strikes and work slowdowns or stoppages is incalculable, especially in key industries such as education, transportation, and logistics. These disruptions will negatively affect supply chains, reduce productivity, and increase business costs.

Escalating union rhetoric deepens the divide between employers and employees, creating a hostile work environment that discourages partnership. This often leads to lower morale, reduced productivity, and less innovation.

MSMEs and startups are particularly vulnerable to militant labor actions as they lack the financial resilience of larger corporations. Anti-employer actions such as boycotts, slowdowns, strikes, or damaging public campaigns will put these companies at risk of closure, resulting in job losses and stifling entrepreneurship, which is essential for economic growth.

Persistent pressure by unions for unsustainable wage increases or benefits could lead to job losses and capital flight. Employers are forced to downsize or relocate to countries or regions with more favorable labor conditions. This will hurt local economies, and reduce the country’s competitiveness in the global market.

There are historical examples of large multinational companies that closed their Philippine operations due to reported hostile union demands. While there maybe other economic factors that were cited to have caused the plant shutdowns, the labor issue was confidentially cited in reports.

Furthermore, inflationary pressures resulting from excessive wage hikes or benefits pushed by unions have driven up production costs which are then passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. This contributes to inflation, reducing the purchasing power of all workers, including union members.

Balancing workers’ rights and economic sustainability is crucial. While workers have the right to advocate for fair treatment and better wages, there is a fine line between legitimate demands and economically damaging behavior. A balanced and communal approach, where unions and employers work together, is essential to finding solutions that benefit both workers and the broader economy.

Constructive dialogue between labor and management is the key. Only by working together can both sides address grievances to support economic growth, preserve jobs and ensure the long-term health of companies. Attaining equilibrium between workers’ rights and economic stability is vital to avoiding the risks associated with more combative approaches.

This article hopes to reignite meaningful and productive discussions between unions and employers on how to protect both labor interests and the economic well-being of the country. Progress, shared prosperity, and long-term economic growth are best achieved through genuine collaboration, not uncivil confrontation.