House takes flak over security plan
Supporters, on the other hand, maintain that erring on the side of caution is both prudent and necessary, particularly in a politically-charged environment.
Supporters, on the other hand, maintain that erring on the side of caution is both prudent and necessary, particularly in a politically-charged environment.
Security measures have been tightened for Ramil Madriaga, a key witness in the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, as the House of Representatives prepares for its next hearing, but some see the overkill as theatrics.
The scale and visibility of the security arrangements have drawn mixed reactions. Critics argue that the measures appear excessive, bordering on theatrical, and may be intended to dramatize the proceedings rather than address any clear and present threat.
For some observers, the optics risk overshadowing the substance of the hearing, shifting attention away from the core issues at hand.
Supporters, on the other hand, maintain that erring on the side of caution is both prudent and necessary, particularly in a politically-charged environment.
They contend that ensuring the safety of a key witness is fundamental to upholding due process and public confidence in the impeachment process.
“We already adopted the (motion) to subpoena all the documents … The members will be expecting this to be available during the next hearing,” Lanao del Sur Rep. Zia Alonto said.
Madriaga’s role cited
Articles 3 and 4 of the third and fourth impeachment complaints, respectively, allege that Duterte offered bribes to officials of the Department of Education (DepEd) during her tenure.
“Second, I think the report of the NBI regarding their handling of Madriaga will also be made available,” he added.
He added that the panel also approved additional protection for Madriaga.
“Because there is also a request, I think it was already approved, to beef up the security of Madriaga because his participation would be consequential in the determination of the impeachment hearing,” he said.
Madriaga, who is considered a central witness in allegations against the Vice President, is expected to show up at the next committee hearing, Adiong said.
Duterte’s camp has rejected the allegations, calling them politically charged.
The Vice President earlier questioned efforts to place Madriaga under House protection, saying such actions risk further politicizing the process.
The House justice committee will continue on 14 April to determine whether there is probable cause to elevate the impeachment case to the Senate, where a full trial would take place.
