A motion for inhibition filed by a defendant in a criminal case involving a mining firm was denied by a Nueva Vizcaya Regional Trial Court (RTC) for lack of legal or factual basis to disqualify the presiding judge.

The motion, filed by defendant Florentino Daynos in a criminal case involving Woggle Corp., was denied in a ruling issued on 15 December, 2025 by Paul Attolba Jr., presiding judge of RTC Branch 30.

The case arose from the alleged unauthorized erection of barricades along public roads in Dupax del Norte, Nueva Vizcaya. Authorities reported that the obstructions hindered the movement of vehicles and equipment associated with a mineral exploration project.

Court records identified Daynos as a leader of a group opposing the project. He faced criminal charges after police intervened in the barricading incidents, which authorities said disrupted lawful operations and restricted access to public thoroughfares.

In its ruling, the RTC held that inhibition is not a matter of right and must be supported by clear and specific evidence of bias or prejudice. The court stressed that bare allegations or dissatisfaction with prior judicial rulings do not meet the legal threshold for disqualification, noting that judicial impartiality is presumed under Supreme Court doctrine.

Judge Attolba found no showing of personal or pecuniary interest that would compromise the fair adjudication of the case.

The court directed the proceedings to continue to ensure the speedy disposition of the case and cautioned against the use of motions for inhibition as dilatory tactics.

Officials of Woggle Corp. said the company respects the ruling and remains committed to the orderly administration of justice through due process.