Sara’s making (or unmaking)

February looms with a calculated plan to refile impeachment charges against Vice President Sara Duterte. On the surface, it’s just another reckoning: charges revived, Mary Grace Piattos summoned, Congress on stage again.

The timing is lethal, landing just as the opening volleys of her 2028 campaign begin.

In impeachment season, every day is a battle for damage control. Campaigning under fire is a desperate dash through a hailstorm of bullets — you might cross the finish line, but you’ll be riddled with holes.

This maneuver pushes the presumed presidential contender off the offensive and into survival mode, chipping away at her standing in the court of public opinion long before any formal verdict is handed down.

It can cut two ways: either the months of exhausting political theater will turn the public against everyone involved, or Sara’s political radioactivity will spark its own strange glow.

This nation, addicted to the spectacle of the wronged, has long resurrected the disgraced and crowned the unfit. The dance is old: suffer in public, and the crowd will demand your redemption.

The Duterte brand — forged in grievance, grit, and a calculated middle finger to “imperial” Manila — seems tailor-made for martyrdom, except martyrdom demands a purity that Sara’s tangled record cannot deliver.

Her choice to vanish when the country needed her revealed what she truly values: spectacle over service.

Martyrdom demands sacrifice and conviction — qualities she abandoned. Her retreat from responsibility was less a stand than a surrender, exposing her allegiance to dynasty over duty and sealing her fate as unfit to lead.

Her father’s presidency peaked when the country was primed for an outsider’s fury: soaring crime fears and deep disgust with the Yellows.

That fury has settled into a dull, restless skepticism — one that no longer rallies behind a rebel but braces against an entrenched dynasty struggling to stay relevant.

Martyrdom demands a clear enemy. The 2026 impeachment won’t get one. Instead, it’ll be fought by a fractured mob of grudges: a president who washes his hands with a Congress moving in lockstep, and the Pinks and Yellows, long eclipsed, returning with sharpened teeth and old scores to settle.

Still, misjudgment remains a real risk. Sara commands the DDS base: fervent loyalty, impervious to reason or evidence.

Its political muscle showed in the last midterms, driving turnout and clinching key Senate seats widely seen as buffers against impeachment efforts. Another was a Senate landslide — a vote less about democracy than a compulsory pledge to the Duterte cause.

It was a calculated reaffirmation of power, signaling that despite legal and political storms, Duterte’s base remains a formidable force shaping the limits of accountability.

If Sara Duterte survives 2026 bloodied but standing, she could emerge with exactly the kind of “I fought the system” credentials her base craves.

So the real question isn’t whether impeachment will happen — it’s whether the opposition can resist the temptation to make her the martyr she desperately needs to become.