DoJ: Court to decide Patidongan’s credibility
Text size
Three decades after the Marcopper mining disaster devastated Marinduque’s waterways, the province is again pressing the…
Housing is probably the biggest issue affecting people the world over.
Malacañang on Monday called for a more thorough investigation into the questioned flood control projects in Taguig…
The defense on Monday backed the move by senator-judges to exclude a prosecution witness who testified on the firearms…
The Department of Justice (DoJ) said Saturday it is up to the courts to determine the credibility of Julie “Dondon” Patidongan’s claims regarding the disappearance of some 34 cockfight enthusiasts.
Justice Undersecretary Raul Vasquez acknowledged that Patidongan’s recent revelations were “huge factors to consider” in advancing the case of the missing sabungeros.
Among the developments he cited was the discovery of bones in sacks submerged in Taal Lake, which are undergoing DNA and forensic analysis.
“These are all developments that would really support his statement, the real evidence. Meaning it is not hearsay. The statement is no longer a declaration nor allegation because of the additional pieces of evidence to prove that the claim of Patidongan is supported by evidence,” Vasquez said.
He added that if the bones are confirmed to be human and match the DNA of the missing victims’ families, it would “complete” the case. This would allow authorities to elevate the charges to murder.
“If the DNA does not match, that would point to a bigger problem,” Vasquez said.
The DoJ, he said, is working to build a case anchored on “supporting evidence that is real, object evidence,” which he said would help shield it from tampering or political influence.
Vasquez maintained that Patidongan’s story is credible, noting, “He told us where the bodies were dumped and we found the sacks of bones.”
As for the possibility of Patidongan turning state witness, Vasquez said it would depend on his credibility and on whether he is “not the most guilty.”
Patidongan would need to apply for inclusion in the Witness Protection Program, and it would ultimately be up to the court to determine if he qualifies.
