SUBSCRIBE NOW
SUBSCRIBE NOW

Winners and losers

I hope candidates in future elections refrain from commissioning surveys that manipulate public opinion.
CYNTHIA D. BALANA
Published on

Monday’s Halalan 2025 was a critical time for the Philippines as various political parties and candidates strategically aligned themselves for victory and defeat.

Public discussions about potential winners and losers were vibrant, nuanced and entertaining, with many votes still being counted in national and local elections as of this writing.

“Waah talo karamihan sa Quadcomm,” jubilant pro-Duterte netizens posted on X, referring to some members of the House of Representatives. “Buti nga sa matapobreng bulilit na yan,” referring to the matriarch of a wealthy and prominent family who lost in her congressional bid.

“Si, Bam, No. 2? Si Kiko (Pangilinan) nasa top 6, unbelievable!” said pro-Marcos detractors. “Wowowee, pasok si Marcoleta!” declared another.

The numerous posts provided insights into how voters expressed their preferences through their votes.

In the senatorial race, reelectionist Senator Bong Go was the clear frontrunner, receiving votes likely even from pro-Marcos supporters, based on his significant number of votes.

Go’s victory is not solely connected to former President Rodrigo Duterte. I have heard stories about his humility and charitable acts, both as a public figure and a private individual, and how his acts of kindness resonated with the beneficiaries during their time of need. HIs impressive reputation positions him as a potential frontrunner for the 2028 presidential election, especially if impeached Vice President Sara Duterte is removed during the Senate trial.

The various social media posts comprehensively analyze how voters expressed their preferences through the ballot box. These insights will explore the factors that influenced voters’ decisions, the demographics of those who participated, and the implications of these voting patterns on the overall electoral outcomes.

By examining the motivations and celebrations surrounding each vote, we can better understand the public sentiment and the key issues that resonated with the electorate.

Grassroots activists and political analysts are currently analyzing voting trends and public sentiment. Key issues such as economic recovery, corruption, and social justice have emerged as the primary topics that influenced voter choices.

Many candidates used social media and community engagement to connect with constituents during the campaign. This shift in traditional campaigning methods will determine how the next presidential election will be conducted.

With the epic rise of young, educated voters, candidates who resonate with the youth, particularly on issues like education, employment, and social equity, saw significant support. Effective campaigns that utilized social media and addressed the concerns of the younger demographic could have provided an advantage for these candidates.

As the results continue to unfold, the implications for governance and policy direction in the Philippines are beginning to take shape, highlighting the importance of this electoral cycle in shaping the nation’s future.

Those with deep roots in their communities may continue to dominate the election landscape. Incumbents with strong track records benefited from voters’ preference for stability. Candidates who can form strategic alliances with various political or civic groups enhance their chances.

On the losing side, candidates who relied heavily on emotional rhetoric without substantial policy proposals struggled. Voters are becoming increasingly discerning, seeking candidates who can provide tangible solutions rather than promises.

Those embroiled in controversies and scandals faced the voters’ backlash. Trust is paramount in politics, and candidates who have lost credibility may find it hard to recover in the electoral process.

Candidates seen as divisive or extreme in their views alienated moderate voters. Those who failed to address local concerns or appeared disconnected from their constituents’ realities were disadvantaged.

Lastly, popular pollsters, although not candidates, can be categorized as losers for continuously failing to predict a realistic outcome of the senatorial race, particularly regarding the top six slots.

Based on previous survey results, some candidates expected to be in the senatorial Magic 12 were nowhere near it. I hope candidates in future elections refrain from commissioning surveys that manipulate public opinion.

As the results continue to be counted, new political dynamics are undoubtedly unfolding, reminding us of the importance of civic involvement and the power of every vote in shaping our future.

For feedback, text to 09451450681 or email at cynchdb@gmail.com

Latest Stories

No stories found.
logo
Daily Tribune
tribune.net.ph