Healing the nation

The recent arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte by the International Criminal Court (ICC) has intensified national debates, exposing deep-seated divisions within the country. This event has not only sparked discussions on legal jurisdiction but has also prompted religious leaders to call for unity amidst the prevailing polarization.

Duterte was detained at Manila’s main airport upon his return from Hong Kong last week, following a secret arrest warrant issued by the ICC. The charges pertain to crimes against humanity linked to his controversial “war on drugs,” which resulted in thousands of deaths during his tenure as both mayor of Davao and as president.

Human rights organizations and victims’ families have lauded this development as a significant step toward justice. However, Duterte’s supporters view the arrest as politically motivated and illegal, arguing that the Philippines’ withdrawal from the ICC in 2019 nullifies the court’s jurisdiction over the country.

The crux of the legal debate centers on the ICC’s authority to prosecute Duterte. The Philippines officially withdrew from the Rome Statute — the treaty establishing the ICC — in 2019. Nevertheless, the ICC maintains that it retains jurisdiction over crimes committed before the withdrawal, as the alleged offenses occurred while the Philippines was still a member.

This position is supported by various legal experts and human rights advocates who argue that withdrawal does not absolve accountability for prior actions.

Conversely, Duterte’s legal team contends that the arrest infringes on the country’s sovereignty and that any allegations should be addressed within the Philippine judicial system.

Amid the escalating tensions, religious leaders have stepped forward, urging the nation to seek unity and peace. During the 39th anniversary of the EDSA People Power Revolution, over 130 church leaders issued a statement emphasizing the importance of choosing sides and not remaining silent in the face of injustice. They highlighted that faith must manifest in concrete actions for justice, human rights and accountability.

This sentiment was echoed during a recent homily, where a priest addressed the congregation, lamenting the polarization among Filipinos and calling on them to listen to Jesus and unite for the nation’s sake.

The involvement of religious figures in socio-political matters is not new in the Philippines. Historically, the church has played a pivotal role in advocating for social justice and moral guidance.

In recent times, faith leaders have called for unity in the fight against injustices and the challenges posed by the pandemic, urging Christian churches to work together for the benefit of the poor and vulnerable.

Such interventions underscore the influential position of religious institutions in shaping public opinion and fostering national solidarity.

The arrest of Duterte has undeniably deepened existing societal fissures, bringing to the forefront issues of legal jurisdiction, human rights and national identity.

While the legal proceedings will follow their course, the broader challenge lies in reconciling differing perspectives and healing the nation’s divisions. In this context, the calls for unity from religious leaders serve as a poignant reminder of the need to transcend partisan lines and work collectively towards justice, peace and the common good.

As a whole, the Duterte arrest has become a catalyst for both legal scrutiny and moral reflection. As the nation grapples with these complex issues, the collective wisdom and compassion of its people, guided by ethical and spiritual principles, will be crucial in navigating the path to unity and healing.