Duterte’s war against ICC

Duterte’s war against ICC | Daily Tribune

Yesterday, former President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested by Interpol upon his return from a trip to Hong Kong. It is rare for a former head of state to be ordered apprehended on a warrant issued by an international organization, the International Criminal Court (ICC), on allegations of crimes against humanity during his controversial time in office.

Duterte arrived in the Philippines at 9:20 a.m. His lawyers, eager to question the legality of the ICC arrest order, especially since the Philippines had already withdrawn its membership, were not allowed inside the holding area. Prosecutor General Richard Anthony Fadullon served the notification for the warrant of arrest issued by the ICC.

The events unfolding at Ninoy Aquino International Airport, where the President was being held as of press time, have sparked widespread debate and concern.

As the story develops, it will be critical to observe how this arrest impacts the political landscape in the Philippines, particularly as the nation prepares for future elections. Would this event spark a renewed push for accountability and reform, or will it further entrench the divisions that have marked Duterte’s presidency?

The ICC first acknowledged the alleged abuses in 2016 and commenced its investigation in 2021. The investigation spanned cases from November 2011, during Duterte’s mayorship of Davao, to March 2019, just before the Philippines withdrew from the ICC.

Duterte’s emotional response, as shown in videos shared by his daughter, conveyed the contentious nature of his leadership and the ongoing conflict between his administration’s policies and the rule of law.

His claim of “illegal detention” prompts concerns regarding due process and the legal framework associated with his arrest. While he may present himself as a victim, the charges from the ICC spark broader discussions about accountability, governance, and the obligations of leaders to uphold human rights.

During the Duterte administration, the aggressive anti-drug campaign sparked serious and violent criticism both domestically and internationally. There were widespread reports of extrajudicial killings and human rights violations, which the former President himself did not refute. He has expressed no remorse for these actions until now.

Efforts in international law to hold leaders accountable for their actions in office have been ongoing. This event could have significant implications for the Philippines, its legal system, and the global human rights and justice conversation.

The former president has been a polarizing figure since taking office in 2016. He has upheld a “tough on crime” stance that continues to garner domestic support from his followers while drawing international condemnation from foreign observers.

Supporters of Duterte have praised his efforts at combating drug-related crime, while critics have condemned the human rights abuses and extrajudicial killings associated with his administration. The ICC’s involvement showed the seriousness of the allegations against him. It also reflects an increasing commitment among international organizations to hold leaders accountable for human rights violations.

Malacañang’s quick confirmation of the warrant illustrates how the current administration manages its relationship with international law and institutions. This response indicates how the government plans to engage with the ICC in the future, particularly in reaffirming its commitment to human rights and the rule of law, irrespective of political affiliations.

In any case, the situation serves as a poignant reminder of the potential consequences leaders face when their actions are scrutinized on the global stage. It challenges Filipinos and the international community to reflect on the balance between power, justice, and the preservation of human rights.

For feedback, text to 09451450681 or email at cynchdb@gmail.com.