MaThon may screen ahead of Yap movie

A hardly heard-of movie of (ex-?) lovers Maris Racal and Anthony Jennings might be shown way ahead of Darryl Yap’s controversial The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma.
Ever heard of Sosyal Climbers? That’s the title of a movie quietly shot by MaThon (the loveteam’s portmanteau, remember?) for Netflix Philippines some time ago.
The streaming giant released the film’s trailer on its Facebook page on 30 January, and announced that the movie will start showing on 27 February.
The over-a-minute trailer features the pair pretending to be a rich couple, interacting with real wealthy people in an apparent attempt to gain money from them. The clip also includes a love scene and a kissing scene of the actors.
Racal and Jennings first hinted at the film directed by John Paul Laxamana in March 2024 yet. At that time, the loveteam was sizzling in Kapamilya Channel’s series Can’t Buy Me Love, overshadowing the series’ almost reticent lead stars Belle Mariano and Donny Pangilinan.
Postponed until further notice
Meanwhile, the scheduled theater release of the Pepsi Paloma film on 5 February will be most likely postponed until the court has decided on the 19 counts of cyberlibel case filed against Yap by actor-host-producer Vic Sotto due to his being explicitly mentioned in the film’s teaser as having raped the teen actress Pepsi Paloma (allegedly in 1982).
The vice chairman of the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB), lawyer Paulino Cases Jr., has written to the film’s distributor, Leo Olinares, that the movie cannot be reviewed until three government entities have certified that it is no longer a subject of litigation or administrative investigation. Atty. Cases is also the chairman of the MTRCB hearing and adjudication committee.
A part of Cases’ letter mightily states, “Considering the controversies surrounding the aforementioned film, and in view of Section 3(c), Paragraph VII of the Presidential Decree No. 1986 (P.D. No, 1986) which explicitly prohibits the exhibition of materials that pertain to a matter sub judice in nature, the Board, prior to the review of any material related to the said film, hereby request a Certificate/Clearance of No Pending Criminal, Civil, or Administrative Case lodged or filed under the following jurisdiction: Regional Trial Court, Muntinlupa City; Department of Justice, Taft Avenue, Ermita, Manila; and Office of the City Prosecutor, Muntinlupa City.”
Sotto filed his cyberlibel case in Muntinlupa on 9 January. The series of hearings for cyberlibel began only on 17 January at the sala of Judge Liezel Aquiatan. No date has been set and announced as to when the case will be resolved. Litigations are known to take months to conclude.
Cases had to write to Olinares as a reaction to Yap’s Facebook posting that his film is already “under review” by the MTRCB. It was Olinares who submitted the film to MTRCB, not Yap himself, which is why Cases communicated with Olinares, not Yap.
Actually, the MTRCB did not accept the submission and instead required Olinares to secure certifications from the said government agencies before the film can be reviewed and rated.
Olinares explicitly stated in his letter that the requirement is not a prohibition and judgment of the film.
Yap seems to be still uninformed about the prerequisite for review for his film when he casually announced that it was already under review. He also seems to be unaware of that particular provision of the MTRCB law.
In his FB-posted reaction to Cases’ letter, Yap stressed that none of the 16 movies he has previously released was subjected to such prerequisites for a review and rating.
But none of those 16 films, mostly controversy-seeking, caused him to be sued. Some of those films were released through the streaming platform Vivamax (now known simply as VMX) where MTRCB approval and classification are not required. VMX movies, all sex-oriented, with so much baring of the actors, are actually intended for adults only.
Olinares has expressed his willingness to book Yap’s film at a later date. He also said that he himself will secure all the certifications required by the MTRCB.
Yap’s pro-bono lawyer, the well-known Raymund Fortun, has told the media, “I am not assigned to secure MTRCB approval for Yap’s film.”

