Good intentions

Monday’s peace rally in Manila and other parts of the country, organized by the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC), drew an astounding crowd of nearly two million participants. The event raises important questions about the intersection of religion and politics in the Philippines.

Though INC officials have maintained that the event was focused solely on promoting peace and unity, the sheer scale of the gathering cannot be overlooked, especially in the context of the upcoming midterm elections.

The INC’s rally highlights a critical societal need: a collective call for peace amid the escalating political tensions.

INC spokesperson Edwin Zabala’s remarks about forgiveness and unity resonate deeply in a country grappling with rising living costs and political division. His call to return to the basic principles of decency and cohesion reflects our collective yearning for stability that transcends sectarian lines, appealing even to non-members.

Malacañang’s interpretation of the event as a positive contribution to the national discourse is also worth noting. By viewing the rally as a means to foster conversation on pertinent issues, the administration distanced itself from any negative implications of the peace rally.

When communities are becoming more polarized, and divisions are often deepening, the importance of this sentiment cannot be overstated. As individuals and groups increasingly find themselves at odds, the ability to engage in constructive dialogue is frequently compromised.

However, the rally’s political undertones cannot be dismissed. As Zabala highlighted, the INC’s support of President Marcos’s stance not to proceed with Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment shows how religious gatherings can be co-opted into political discourse.

While the INC claims to advocate for peace without political motives, many politicians at the rally — seeking support for their campaigns — blur these lines. Fortunately, members were prevented from chanting the names of these politicians.

The careful navigation between spiritual guidance and political influence raises a cautionary flag about how religious institutions can wield their power in the electoral arena.

When religious groups take a stand on political matters, it can influence their followers’ perspectives and decisions, potentially leading to a one-sided narrative rather than encouraging a balanced dialogue among citizens.

The directive for INC members to refrain from explicitly supporting or condemning politicians during the rally further complicates the issue. It indicates an attempt to maintain neutrality while wielding significant influence over public sentiment.

The intricate balancing act highlights the complex relationships between religious belief, political alignment, political affiliations and social obligations. It reveals how people’s faith can influence political views and decisions while reflecting their responsibilities toward their community and society.

Ultimately, the INC rally serves as a microcosm of the ongoing struggle for peace and unity in the Philippines, reflecting both the desire for healing and the pitfalls of political engagement.

As the nation approaches a crucial electoral period, it will be essential for all parties — religious groups, politicians, and citizens alike — to engage in sincere dialogue that prioritizes the common good over individual interests.

The call for peace is commendable, but it should be followed by a commitment to transparency and integrity with an open mind and the right intention to ensure that the path forward truly reflects our needs and aspirations as a people.

When political and religious leaders align their actions with good intentions, they can create a political environment that encourages resolution, fosters peace, and promotes growth.

For feedback, text to 09451450681 or email at cynchdb@gmail.com.