BFAR’s P2.1-B vessel bidding postponed



Savoy Hotel Manila is bringing Filipino culture and wellness into the guest experience through its Sampaguita Brand of…

The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday confirmed it is reviewing the United States government’s formal request for…

The Economic Journalists Association of the Philippines (EJAP) will bring together the Marcos administration’s economic…

The City of Manila suspended afternoon classes at all levels in public and private schools on Thursday, 13 August, as…

With college graduates accounting for a significant share of unemployed Filipinos, Enderun Colleges is urging its Class…
The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) has postponed the bidding for the procurement of various vessels worth P2.1 billion, raising concerns after no public announcement was made by the Special Bids and Awards Committee (SBAC).
“If the postponement is not announced publicly, some bidders may have an unfair advantage over others. This can lead to allegations of favoritism or corruption,” said lawyer Faye Singson, a former assistant prosecutor at the Office of the Ombudsman.
Singson said postponements could also delay the procurement process, which may have negative consequences for the government agency or entity involved.
She explained that the rescheduling of the opening of the bidding process from 11 to 15 October exceeded the 52-working days timeline prescribed under the 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act (RA) 9184.
Under Section 8 of RA 9184, all procurement activities must be conducted in a fair, transparent and competitive manner. Postponing the bidding process without proper notice could violate this principle, according to Singson.
She noted that Section 10 outlines the procedures for conducting a bidding, including the requirement of a public notice and the issuance of supplemental bid bulletins for any changes to the bidding process.
“This section also specifies the prescribed timeline for a bidding. Overextending the process beyond the maximum 52-day limit without proper justification can violate this provision,” she pointed out.