Enrile tells courts: Decide on plunder case

Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Juan Ponce Enrile

Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Juan Ponce Enrile

The Supreme Court (SC) has imposed a heavier penalty for psychological violence committed against women and children…
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) on Friday said the 2026 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE) will…

Lasting peace is the cornerstone of economic development, as Vice President Sara Duterte cited the transformation of…

Despite the increase in the number of working children, the number engaged in child labor remained below 2023 levels.

Veterinarians described the eagle as lethargic, weak with down feathers matted by mud and debris and a severe maggot…
Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Juan Ponce Enrile has urged the courts on Wednesday to decide on his plunder case as he sees no problem with Supreme Court’s decision to let the trial continue.
In an interview at the Batasang Pambansa complex, Enrile was asked about the Supreme Court’s decision to let the Sandiganbayan continue with the plunder trial.
To recall, 13 judges voted to reject Enrile’s petition to dismiss his case.
“Let them decide. Until now, they are not deciding. That’s been over 10 years, and there is no evidence presented to me,” Enrile told reporters. “Not only that, I have many cases, like the coconut levy; they benefited from it. Until now, I do not know what happened to my cases.”
Enrile is one of three senators who have been charged with plunder for their alleged role in the pork barrel scam, while Senators Jinggoy Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. have been found not guilty.
'Let them decide.'
Previously, the Office of the Ombudsman charged Enrile, his former chief of staff Gigi Reyes, Napoles and others with theft in 2014 because of the Priority Development Assistance Fund scam.
They were slapped with cases after providing some of their funds to Napoles’ non-government organizations as part of her pork barrel scam.
After that, Enrile went to the Sandiganbayan Third Division and filed for a bill of particulars — a motion lets the accused ask the prosecution for specific information so that they can get ready for trial.
Even though the anti-graft court turned down Enrile’s request, the Supreme Court overturned its decision on 11 August 2015.