
BANGUED, Abra — Police arrested a 56-year-old school principal in Lagangilang, Abra, in connection with the fatal…
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) has received its sixth consecutive unmodified opinion from…

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has appointed Mel Senen Sarmiento to concurrently serve as chairperson of the…

Armaments from communist terrorist group (CTG) as well as explosives were discovered in a cache during law enforcement…

After more than a week at the Philippine National Police (PNP) General Hospital, Sen. Rodante Marcoleta has recovered…

Supreme Court
What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
The Supreme Court (SC) did not issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) to halt the implementation of Executive Order (EO) 62, which reduces the tariff on imported rice and other agricultural commodities from 35 percent to 15 percent.
Instead, the high court directed respondents in the petition filed by several farmer and cooperative groups to submit their comments on both the petition and the plea for a TRO within 10 days of receiving the resolution.
In a session on Wednesday, the SC stated, “The Court, without giving due course to the petition and prayer for TRO, required the respondents to file their comments within a non-extendable period of 10 days from notice.”
This means that the requested TRO to stop the enforcement of EO 62 has not been denied and will be resolved once the comments are filed.
The petition was filed by officers and members of Samahang Industriya ng Agrikultura (Sinag) Inc.; Federation of Free Farmers Inc. (FFFI); United Broiler Raisers Association 1 Inc.; Sorosoro Ibaba Development Cooperative (SIDC); and Magsasaka Partylist Rep. Argel Cabatbat.