SC presses justice for the marginalized
The ULAS Rules intend to consolidate the efforts of lawyers in registered organizations in providing legal resources to those most in need.
The ULAS Rules intend to consolidate the efforts of lawyers in registered organizations in providing legal resources to those most in need.

Police have launched a manhunt and formed a special task force to investigate the fatal shooting of a prominent…

The so-called “Oplan Romanov,” or the alleged covert operation purportedly aimed at eliminating Vice President Sara…

TACLOBAN CITY — Just a week after classes resumed following a fatal mass shooting on campus, officials at San Jose…

The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) has signed up another corporation to expand public access to the…

Water reserves at Pantabangan Dam are rising steadily following heavy rains brought by the southwest monsoon and…

Supreme Court Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo
(Courtesy of the Supreme Court Public Information Office)
What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo cited the need to provide comprehensive and effective access to justice for underrepresented, indigent and marginalized communities.
The Supreme Court head pressed justice for all during the final regional consultation for the Unified Legal Aid Service (ULAS) held in Iloilo City recently.
He explained that under ULAS, whose rules are being finalized, it would be the duty of every lawyer to help improve and strengthen the country’s justice system.
The ULAS Rules intend to consolidate the efforts of lawyers in registered organizations in providing legal resources to those most in need.
Gesmundo highlighted that the proposed rules would allow the said organizations to track and aggregate the hours contributed by their lawyers.
Likewise, keeping track of the lawyers and the cases they handle would ensure that the most suitable professionals are assigned to beneficiaries.
During the consultations, key concerns were raised regarding the determination, calculation, and monitoring of the actual hours served under the ULAS framework.
Participants sought clarity on these aspects, especially in light of previous legal aid initiatives that promoted pro bono services.
Gesmundo also stressed the necessity of implementing safeguards to prevent unfair practices and abuses in the aggregation of creditable hours.
Additionally, he proposed that the Supreme Court should consider offering further incentives for lawyers who fulfill their legal aid obligations.
Gesmundo acknowledged the support of the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and The Asia Foundation in the ULAS initiative.