AI’s (empty?) promises
We must demand transparency and accountability from tech companies, urging them to disclose not only the capabilities but also the limitations and the behind-the-scenes processes involved in their AI-driven products.

We must demand transparency and accountability from tech companies, urging them to disclose not only the capabilities but also the limitations and the behind-the-scenes processes involved in their AI-driven products.


The House of Representatives is crafting an artificial intelligence (AI) law that will emphasize developing the…

More than 200 economists and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers, including 16 Nobel laureates, are calling for…

Anthropic has released a behind-the-scenes look at the development of Claude Code, revealing that the artificial…

Meta Platforms Inc. will invest an additional $40 billion to expand its artificial intelligence data center campus in…

The Philippine information technology and business process management (IT-BPM) industry is targeting more than $50…
Artificial Intelligence (AI) had been touted as a game-changer across various industries, with tech companies constantly showcasing their latest AI innovations as “groundbreaking.”
The potential of AI to revolutionize sectors like healthcare, transportation, and retail is undeniably exciting. However, the reality behind these technological advancements often falls short of the glossy promotional materials we are presented with.
The fervor surrounding AI has led to a competitive landscape where exaggerating the capabilities of AI technologies has become commonplace. From self-driving cars to AI in medical diagnostics, the public is frequently exposed to a vision of these technologies as being much more advanced and ready for widespread adoption than they actually are.
Amazon Go, marketed by Amazon as a revolutionary “Just Walk Out” shopping experience, uses AI to eliminate the need for checkout lines. This technology was presented as a seamless and futuristic approach to grocery shopping.
However, it was later exposed that the system was not as automated as initially claimed. Amazon employed around a thousand employees in India to manually review and analyze purchases to ensure the accuracy of transactions, a critical detail that was not disclosed at the launch of Amazon Go.
This disclosure highlighted the gap between the AI capabilities that were advertised and the reality of the human labor required to make the system function effectively.
Media and public narratives often focus on the potential and futuristic promises of AI, sometimes at the expense of discussing the current limitations and challenges. This can result in misunderstandings about the readiness of AI technologies for everyday use and can skew public and investor expectations.
Looking at the AI revolution requires a critical perspective from consumers and stakeholders. Understanding the difference between the potential of AI and its current capabilities is essential.
We must demand transparency and accountability from tech companies, urging them to disclose not only the capabilities but also the limitations and the behind-the-scenes processes involved in their AI-driven products.
Advocating for responsible development and communication about AI will ensure that its progress benefits society holistically, rather than being clouded by hype and ultimately leading to public disenchantment.