‘AI George Carlin’ podcasters settle lawsuit

AI Carlin

AI Carlin

More than 200 economists and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers, including 16 Nobel laureates, are calling for…

Anthropic has released a behind-the-scenes look at the development of Claude Code, revealing that the artificial…

Meta Platforms Inc. will invest an additional $40 billion to expand its artificial intelligence data center campus in…

The Philippine information technology and business process management (IT-BPM) industry is targeting more than $50…

Sometimes even the routines that have seen me through decades get to me now. Perhaps there is more to this than aging…
LOS ANGELES (AFP) — Podcasters who controversially used AI to emulate the late US comedian George Carlin in a recent comedy episode have reached a settlement with his estate after family members sued.
The legal battle over the “Dudesy” podcast’s one-hour special “George Carlin: I’m Glad I’m Dead” highlights the rapidly growing role of AI in entertainment, which is viewed as a threat by many creatives and was a key issue in last year’s Hollywood strikes.
The terms of the deal, which was confirmed Thursday by Carlin’s estate, were not revealed. But the episode in question has been removed from the “Dudesy” website and other platforms.
“I am pleased that this matter was resolved quickly and amicably, and I am grateful that the defendants acted responsibly by swiftly removing the video they made,” said Kelly Carlin, daughter of the influential counter-culture comic, referring to a video that accompanied the podcast episode.
“While it is a shame that this happened at all, I hope this case serves as a warning about the dangers posed by AI technologies and the need for appropriate safeguards not just for artists and creatives, but every human on earth.”
AI — or artificial intelligence — is increasingly being explored by the entertainment industry to generate content.
Proponents say it can be used to create content at lower costs than would be paid to human artists, and point to potential innovative uses of the technology.
But opponents say it simply draws upon the existing work of human performers, often without their consent or compensation, and point to moral dangers including its use to seemingly reanimate deceased artists in audio or even visual form.
Josh Schiller, a lawyer for Carlin’s estate, said he hoped the settlement “will serve as a blueprint for resolving similar disputes going forward where an artist or public figure has their rights infringed by AI technology.”