In recent years, the relationship between the Philippines and China has been characterized by tension, particularly concerning territorial disputes in the South China Sea.

Beijing has accused Manila of fostering Sinophobia, alleging that labeling China as a threat to Philippine security contributes to anti-Chinese sentiments.

But recent events in the disputed waters only confirm the fact that it is Beijing itself that is creating such sentiments, particularly after its coast guard carried out recent aggressive actions in the West Philippine Sea that resulted in damage to Philippine vessels and injuries to four Filipino crew members.

The Filipino vessels on a rotation and resupply mission to Ayungin Shoal were reportedly harassed, blocked, fired at with water cannons, and bumped by the Chinese Coast Guard and militia ships.

The incident comes just after President Ferdinand Marcos himself warned that the Philippines will push back if the Chinese continue their bullying tactics in the disputed waters.

Is Beijing, therefore, testing Manila’s limits about such pronouncements?

To understand the current tensions, it is essential to contextualize them within historical and geopolitical frameworks. The Philippines and China have had longstanding territorial disputes, primarily centered on the resource-rich South China Sea. The Philippines contests China’s expansive claims to the region, leading to heightened tensions and occasional confrontations.

National security narratives are crucial in shaping public perception and policy decisions. In the Philippines, the narrative of China as a threat to national security has gained traction, fueled by territorial disputes, militarization of artificial islands, and aggressive actions in the South China Sea.

China’s perceived threat has led to increased defense cooperation with traditional allies such as the United States and Japan.

Beijing’s accusation of Sinophobia in the Philippines reflects its concerns over the portrayal of China as a security threat. By framing criticism of its actions as anti-Chinese sentiment, Beijing seeks to undermine efforts to challenge its assertiveness in the region. Accusations of Sinophobia also serve to deflect attention from China’s own aggressive behavior and portray itself as the victim of unjust criticism.

The accusation of Sinophobia oversimplifies the complexities of national security narratives in the Philippines. While there may be instances of anti-Chinese sentiment, particularly amidst territorial disputes, it is essential to distinguish legitimate security concerns from xenophobia. Labeling criticism of China as Sinophobic risks stifling legitimate discourse on national security and undermines efforts to address genuine threats to Philippine sovereignty.

The accusation of Sinophobia exacerbates tensions between the Philippines and China, making diplomatic resolution of territorial disputes more challenging.

By framing criticism as anti-Chinese sentiment, Beijing risks alienating the Filipino populace and hindering efforts to build trust and cooperation between the two nations. Furthermore, it reinforces perceptions of China as a hegemonic power seeking to dictate regional affairs, undermining its efforts to present itself as a responsible stakeholder in the international community.

Addressing tensions between the Philippines and China requires constructive dialogue and mutual understanding. Both nations must recognize the other’s legitimate concerns while refraining from inflammatory rhetoric that exacerbates hostilities. Initiatives aimed at promoting people-to-people exchanges, cultural understanding, and confidence-building measures can help bridge the divide and foster greater cooperation in addressing shared challenges.

The accusation of Sinophobia in the Philippines reflects the complexities of national security narratives in the context of territorial disputes and great power rivalry. While genuine security concerns exist, it is essential to differentiate legitimate criticism from xenophobia and to promote dialogue and understanding between nations.

By addressing underlying grievances and building trust, the Philippines and China can work towards a peaceful resolution of disputes and enhance regional stability.