Daily Tribune

METRO

Supreme Court champions ‘augmented intelligence’

Alvin Murcia · Sep 29, 2026, 10:37 PM

CHIEF Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo addresses international jurists and legal scholars at Stanford Law School, outlining the Supreme Court’s framework on human-centered augmented intelligence. — Photographs courtesy of Supreme Court

Supreme Court (SC) Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo presented the nation’s judicial digital transformation strategy and human-centered artificial intelligence framework before an international assembly of jurists and legal scholars at Stanford University.

Delivering an address at the Rule of Law and Democracy Conference on 26 September, Gesmundo stressed that while the Philippine judiciary is accelerating its adoption of digital tools, technological innovation must strictly preserve due process and public trust.

The Chief Justice highlighted the Supreme Court’s adoption of its Governance Framework on the Use of Human-Centered Augmented Intelligence, citing that the tribunal intentionally uses the term “augmented intelligence” rather than artificial intelligence to reinforce that automated systems exist to assist, rather than replace, human judicial reasoning.

The technology initiative is built on the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027, a five-year blueprint aimed at improving access to justice across the Philippine archipelago through digitized case management, electronic filing, and remote court proceedings.

Gesmundo was joined at the Stanford conference by Supreme Court Associate Justices Jose Midas P. Marquez and Raul B. Villanueva.

In a related address at the Microsoft Frontier Transformation Day in Makati City on 22 September, Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen reinforced the court’s measured approach, urging institutions to address operational bottlenecks before adopting new software solutions.

Leonen highlighted the rollout of eCourt 2.0, an integrated digital ecosystem covering electronic pleadings, digital case management, and electronic appeals.

He cited remote videoconferencing hearings in remote island communities like Tawi-Tawi, where technology eliminated geographical barriers for litigants without sacrificing procedural integrity.

According to Leonen, the tribunal’s AI framework rests on dual pillars of ethical and operational governance to ensure that emerging technologies remain anchored in accountability, transparency, and human dignity.